DJI Air 3 In-Depth Review (with Sports Tracking!)

DJI has announced and released the DJI Air 3, the successor to the Air 2S, and the ‘middle-child’ of the core DJI 3-series lineup. This drone is meant to slot in below the Mavic 3 Pro price/feature-wise while being higher-end than the Mini 3 Pro. In doing so, it includes the vast majority of the Mavic 3 series features, while being largely a step up in minor features compared to the Mini 3 Pro. In other words, it makes for a complicated buying decision tree.

The biggest addition for the Air 3 is that of the new secondary tele/zoom lens, which is a 70mm equivalent lens (compared to the 24mm main lens). As was the case on the Mavic 3/3 Pro, this has quickly become my favorite lens – especially since the resulting image quality coming out of it has been virtually identical to that of the Mavic 3 Pro lens. Likewise, the main camera also got a spec boost, going from f/2.8 on the Air 2S, to f/1.8 on the Air 3. Albeit, that has come with a drop in the total resolution, which was 5.4K on the Air 2S down to 4K on the Air 3. On the flip side, we got much higher slow-mo speeds/resolutions that weren’t there on the Air 2S.

In any case, let’s dive into it!

Oh, and as usual, this review isn’t sponsored. I’ve been using a media loaner Air 3 to put through its paces, after which it goes back to DJI. No company gets to preview my reviews ahead of time, nor have any say on what’s in them. As always, I’m gonna call it like it is – both the good and the bad. If you found this review useful, you can use the links at the bottom, or consider becoming a DCR Supporter, which makes the site ad-free, while also getting access to a mostly weekly video series behind the scenes of the DCR Cave. And, of course, it makes you awesome.

What’s New & Pricing:

The DJI Air 3 is mostly solid upgrade over the Air 2S, but in some cases it won’t be as obvious. It’s one of those upgrades that if you look at something like resolution, you’ll cock your head sideways for the clear resolution downgrade (let’s call a spade a spade), yet when you approach every other aspect of the aircraft, it’s clearly a big upgrade. So much so that the resolution going from 5.4K to 4K isn’t a big deal given the new secondary optical zoom lens gives you native 4K, thus, in effect giving you greater resolution than if you were to crop into that 5.3K image. Anyways, more on that later in the photo section.

Here’s what’s new compared to the Air 2S:

– Added secondary tele (3X) f/2.8 lens, with full/all resolutions and feature support
– Main camera increases from f/2.8 to f/1.7 (better low-light performance)
– Main camera decreases resolution goes from 5.4K/30FPS to 4K/60FPS
– Main camera goes from 1” sensor to 1/1.3”
– Slow-Mo options increase, 4K from 60FPS to 100FPS, and 1080p from 120FPS to 200FPS
– Increased photo size from 20MP to 48MP
– Increased panoramic photo size from 8192×4096 to 13000x6500px
– Increased gimbal arrange to allow from –90* (straight down) to beyond 0* (flat) to upwards 60* (max previous 24* on Air 2S)
– Added sorta-vertical shooting mode (doesn’t rotate gimbal, just crops)
– Added/supported 10-bit on the secondary lens
– Decreased Hyperlapse mode on Air 2 from 8K to 4K
– Added/included support for Hyperlapse mode on the tele camera
– Added Waypoints feature (pre-planned and repeatable flight routes)
– Increased claimed max flight time from 31mins to 46mins
– Added additional obstacle avoidance sensors, now full omnidirectional avoidance (previously no sideways avoidance)
– Added/changed to APAS 5.0 from APAS 5.0 (automated flight system)
– Added support for all FocusTrack modes (ActiveTrack/Spotlight/POI) on BOTH lenses at full resolutions/FPS (previously only 30FPS)
– Added ActiveTrack 5.0 features like one-tap configurable angle of filming
– Added/changed to O4 transmission type from O3
– Increased range to 20KM (FCC), 10KM (CE/EU), 10KM (China), 10KM (MIC)
– Increased controller streamed FPS from 1080p/30fps to 1080p/60fps
– Doubled the controller video streaming bitrate from 16Mbps live video to 80Mbps
– Increased max speed slightly from 19 m/s to 21 m/s (75.6kph)
– Increased official wind resistance spec slightly from 10.7 m/s to 12 m/s
– Aircraft weight increases from 595g to 720g
– Charger supports USB-C 90w fast charging (60 mins)
– New Charging hub can take three partially charged batteries and give you one full one (when not plugged in)
– Aircraft has EU/CE C1 label/sticker on the bottom
– Maintained internal 8GB storage (expandable to 512GB with microSD card)

Got all that? Good. Let’s do a quick spec dump. The TLDR message here on specs is that the two camera lens systems are considered equal in virtually every mode/capacity/resolution, the singular exception being the main lens is f/1.7 and the tele is f/2.8. That won’t matter at all during daylight hours, but will be more noticeable as daylight fades as an f1.7 lens will handle darkness better. I practically have lived on the tele lens here, it’s just awesome, just as I have with the DJI Mavic 3 & 3 Pro. It makes it SO MUCH better to use the drone, and to be a good ‘drone neighbor’, by allowing you to be further from people/things, and get arguably more interesting shots (and certainly safer shots in most cases, especially for Active Track).

Pricing-wise, here’s the details:

DJI Air 3 with DJI RC-N2: $ 1,099/€1.099/962GBP
DJI Air 3 Fly More Combo (with DJI RC-N2): $ 1,199/€1.349/$ 1,199GBP
DJI Air 3 Fly More Combo (with DJI RC 2): $ 1,549/€1.549/1,379GBP
DJI RC 2 (just remote): $ 369/€369/323GBP
DJI Air 3 Battery Charging Hub: $ 69/€69/59GBP

In the combo: Drone, 3 batteries, remote controller, extra props, charging hub

Notably, if you want the DJI RC you need to buy the combo pack. Or, buy the two pieces individually, which at that price point ($ 1,468) means you should just pay the extra $ 81 to get the two extra batteries, extra props, bag, and charging hub. In other words, DJI is shifting back to what they used to do where the combo made a ton of sense. Whereas in the last few years, it didn’t make much sense to purchase for most people. And since the Air 3 isn’t compatible with any other past controllers, you HAVE to get a controller here.

Tech Specs:

This section is all about tech specs, and just the specs. Well, with some opinion mixed in where warranted.

Starting with the two camera systems, or lenses here’s the details:

Main Lens: This is a 82* FOV equivalent to a 24mm lens, at f/1.7, ISO 100-6400, 12,800 for night
Tele Lens: This is a 35* FOV equivalent to a 70mm lens, at f/2.8, ISO 100-6400, 12,800 for night
Note that on ISO, the max for ‘Normal’ shooting mode is 6400, D-LOG M is 1600 and HLG is 1600.

For the most part, both lenses are identical in terms of features, which is notable as many past dual-lens DJI products give lesser features/specs to the secondary zoom lens. Both night and slow-mo modes are supported equally on both lenses. Here’s the core resolution and related specs:

Wide-Angle Lens:
Formats supported: H.264/H.265
4K: 3840×2160@24/25/30/48/50/60/100*fps
FHD: 1920×1080@24/25/30/48/50/60/100*/200*fps
2.7K Vertical Shooting: 1512×2688@24/25/30/48/50/60fps
FHD Vertical Shooting: 1080×1920@24/25/30/48/50/60fps
Normal: 8-bit 4:2:0 (H.264/H.265)
HLG/D-Log M: 10-bit 4:2:0 (H.265)
Still photography resolution: 8064x6048px
*FPS only supported in H.265 format

Tele Lens:
Formats supported: H.264/H.265
4K: 3840×2160@24/25/30/48/50/60/100*fps
FHD: 1920×1080@24/25/30/48/50/60/100*/200*fps
2.7K Vertical Shooting: 1512×2688@24/25/30/48/50/60fps
FHD Vertical Shooting: 1080×1920@24/25/30/48/50/60fps
Normal: 8-bit 4:2:0 (H.264/H.265)
HLG/D-Log M: 10-bit 4:2:0 (H.265)
Still photography resolution: 8064x6048px
*FPS only supported in H.265 format

On the photo-spec side, both lenses are 100% identical for stills (note that panos and such are done on the main lens):

Single Shot: 12 MP and 48 MP
Burst Shooting: 12 MP, 3/5/7 frames; 48 MP, 3/5 frames
Automatic Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 12 MP and 48 MP, 3/5 frames at 0.7 EV step
Timed: 12 MP, 2/3/5/7/10/15/20/30/60 s; 48 MP, 5/7/10/15/20/30/60s
Photo Formats: JPEG/RAW (DNG), either singular or concurrent

On the controller side, you’ve got two options: The all-in-one DJI RC 2, or the phone companion DJI RC-N2. More annoyingly/importantly though, no existing/past DJI controllers are compatible. That’s right, the barely one-year-old DJI RC is not compatible with the Air 3. Nor is the DJI RC Pro. Inversely, the DJI RC 2/N2 is not compatible with any other DJI drones. You’re welcome.

The biggest thing to note about the new O4 on the DJI RC2 & DJI RC-N2 is a huge bump up in real-world range on the European side (CE specs). With the previous DJI RC, for flyers operating under CE/EU transmission rules (which are automatically configured based on your current GPS position), the controller would often drop-out, well short of range.

But with O4 on the DJI Air 3 and the new controllers, I’ve had zero drop-outs. Previously I’d easily drop-out at 1,000m or so – but now I’m able to go well beyond double-that before I turn-around to maintain visual contact. For North America folks under FCC rules, you didn’t likely have much issues previously, as the transmission power was higher there. The current specs here are: 20KM (FCC), 10KM (CE/EU), 10KM (China), 10KM (MIC).

DJI classifies basically the entire world into one of two buckets: FCC rules or CE rules, and those are automatically enforced based on where the aircraft is, not where it was bought. So if I take an aircraft I bought in Amsterdam to the United States, it gets more range under FCC rules (as transmission power changes), and vice versa. Unfortunately, I’m not aware of any DJI site that lists which countries fall under which bucket, but not in the EU will fall under FCC rules.

Long story short, the range is a heck of a lot better now. Yet, at the same time, I’m incredibly disappointed that the DJI RC I bought a year ago is useless with this. The *ENTIRE POINT* of DJI switching to controllers like that was to have a multi-year cycle of supported aircraft, not barely a year. Further, the same is true of the DJI RC Pro. Sure, that’s two years old now, but at the same time, it’s taken DJI an incredibly long each time to support new aircraft with it. That too is now useless. That means if I want to go somewhere with the Mini 3 Pro (for cases requiring a lighter aircraft) and also the Air 3 (for better lenses), I need to take two controllers. Likewise, since there is no DJI RC 2 Pro, people that need some of those features (like HDMI out or 3rd party apps, etc…) can’t use the Air 3.

Sure, I get that in a year or two they’ll be a Mini 4 Pro and a Mavic 4 – and they’ll all probably work with this. But I also refuse to believe DJI couldn’t have at least added backwards compatibility here. I’d have no (major) problems buying a new RC 2 controller, if at least supported the Mini 3 Pro and Mavic 3 series. Hopefully this is something they consider for the future (especially something like a future DJI RC 2 Pro, and have back-unit support), because these sorts of droppages will cause people (including myself) to stop recommending the nicer controllers since the lifespan is effectively just one product.

Air 3 & RC 2 Hardware Usage Basics:

Let’s start with the hardware side and some basics. For European users, the first thing you’ll notice is the C1 label already on the bottom. For US folks, you’ll have Remote ID built in:

Meanwhile, the biggest notable new feature on the Air 3 is the new obstacle avoidance sensors. The previous Air 2S had front/rear/up/down obstacle avoidance sensors, but not sideways (lateral). The Air 3 solves that by positioning four obstacle avoidance sensors on the corners, which form a 360* view of things around it. You can see the two front ones here:

And then the rear ones below. Again, these also covers the sides and up portion too:

This is supplemented by downwards vision, and ground detection sensors, which help it when close to the ground:

On the rear of the drone on the battery itself you’ve got the power button and battery status lights. You’ll also use the power button for pairing the remote, or your phone.

Below that is the MicroSD card slot and USB-C charging port:

The drone batteries can be charged directly in the drone using a USB-C power cable (60w or higher, 90w or higher if you want 1hr charging times), or they can use the charging hub noted below.

On the front of the drone is the gimbal. You’ll see the two lenses clearly labeled, this gimbal has a larger mechanical and controllable range than the previous Air 2S. On the mechanical range, that helps in strong winds or scenarios where the drone is tilted but the camera gimbal can remain level. On the controllable range, you can now use this to tilt upwards to 60* (versus the previous 24* on the Air 2S). That’s useful for doing shots like pointing up at the top of a skyscraper/tree/etc, then ascending above it while tilting down.

As usual, never touch the gimbal while powered on. When unpowered it’s totally fine to touch it gently. There is a plastic gimbal protector to protect the gimbal during travel. Always use it. Just like DJI’s battery charging hubs, every single version is different, and this is probably the best and easiest one to use to date. Some of them have been super finicky, but this one is actually really clear and snaps easily in place.

In terms of folding, like all consumer DJI aircraft the arms fold back towards itself. Still, the weight is 720g, and the size is considerable. It’s basically about the size of a running shoe, so it’s not viable to put in the back of a jersey pocket while cycling (whereas the Mini 3 can easily fit back there). I mean, sure, you can put it in there in a pinch, but you’re one bump away from it flying out.

(Above/be;pw: Mini 3 Pro at left, Air 3 in middle, and Mavic 3 Pro to the right)

Instead, for cycling and hiking I’ve been putting it in a hydration pack, which works well. I stick the DJI RC 2 in a thin/small fabric bag just so it doesn’t get all scratched up.

Speaking of which, let’s take a look at that. This is very similar to the DJI RC 1, except that it now has two external antennas. Here you can see the DJI RC-N2 at left, and RC 2 at right:

On the back, you’ll see they moved the vent placement slightly, and also – most annoyingly, changed the two screw locations in the middle. These screw locations were used for 3rd party mounts to hold the remote on a bike. These screw holes moved about 1mm wider. Yes, just 1mm.

DJI says the made the processor faster in the DJI RC 2 as well, though I haven’t seen any meaningful impact of that. The old one worked fine for me. The display nits are the same at 700 nits, less than the 1,000 nits seen on the DJI RC Pro. Practically speaking I haven’t had any major issues there in bright sunlight. While your phone does have a much higher nits value, that’s only when it’s not overheating. On a hot sunny day (where nits matter), once you stick your phone in something like the DJI RC-N2, it’ll quickly get into a thermal condition that lowers the phone display nits to the same level as the DJI RC 2. Thus, a wash. Note they got rid of one of the two USB-C ports, which served no consumer-facing purpose anyway.

The biggest item is that the new one isn’t compatible with any other DJI aircraft to date (and DJI says that’s a hardware limitation), and inversely, all previous DJI remotes (including the fancy DJI RC Pro), don’t work with the DJI Air 3. The only other remote that works with the DJI Air 3 is the also-newly announced DJI RC-N2, which you use your phone with:

Notably, this remote is backwards compatible with the existing bike mounts I’ve outlined here. It’s how I did my ActiveTrack testing.

In my testing of the two remotes, I found the DJI RC 2 easily beats the range on the DJI RC-N2. I never got low-signal issues on the DJI RC 2, but am getting low-signal in the 1,500-1,600m range on the RC-N2 with the Air 3 (in clear/open conditions).

Finally, as for battery life, DJI claims up to 46 minutes of flying time. While I’m sure they managed to get that in the windless environment they note in their testing, I didn’t see that in my windy Netherlands environment. In most of my tests I was getting about 30-35 minutes of battery time before a forced landing around 10% battery remaining. Keeping in mind that when recording video you burn battery far faster than no-video (such as taking photos). In fact, as tip – if you’re running really tight on battery life trying to get back, always stop recording, you’ll see a huge bump in battery burn rate.

The Charging Hub:

Now, just a quick word about the charging hub, since it doesn’t fit anywhere else. First up, with each successive drone, DJI gives us new batteries. Some day, we’ll get the same batteries for more than one series of drones. However, despite that – they are getting better and better each time with their charging hubs. Sure, it’s taken a decade, but this new ones is by far the best. To begin, it can leverage 100w charging (USB-C), thus, you can charge each battery in 60 minutes, which I’m happy with. And because it’s USB-C, I’m just using my laptop charge to do so. Though, DJI does sell this 100w (dual-USB-C) charger as well:

Second, and most interestingly, if while not connect to power (such as hiking or something), you double-press the charging hub button, it’ll consolidate the juice from the three batteries into one. Thus, if you’ve got three batteries at 25% left, it’ll consolidate that into one battery at ~75%. That’s effin awesome! That almost makes me tempted to drag this thing on treks, because I always end up with multiple 15-25% batteries that are kinda useless.

Lastly, as with the past, you can plug other things into it, and use it as a monster USB-C battery bank.

About the only thing I wish this did was concurrently charge batteries as long as you had a big enough power supply. Today, it’s still successive – one battery after another. But there are plenty higher-wattage chargers (especially in this day of higher-powered USB-C laptops, that could easily take advantage of that. Still, this is by far the best charging hub DJI has made to date.

Video & Photo Features:

(Above: Still from the 70mm lens at sunset shooting 4K/60, no editing)

The Air 3’s two cameras are undoubtedly a selling point, as is the increased aperture of the main 24mm lens, from F/2.8 down to F/1.7. The secondary 70mm lens has an F/2.8 aperture. Both are static.

Much will be made about the shift from a 1” sensor in the Air 2S to a 1/1.3” sensor in the Air 3. Frankly, that’s silly. Mostly because the sensor size is merely one component of a modern imaging pipeline. We’ve seen countless examples of cameras that perform better than 1” sensor cameras, and vice versa. One only need to look at some 1” action cameras that have produced lesser images than that of a non-1” camera. Further, the Air 2S has an imaging pipeline that was developed about 3 years ago, versus the newly generated stacked sensor CMOS of the Air 3.

Instead, we should look at the actual end-results to decide whether the imagery is good. In fact, in some of my testing – specifically low-light testing, the Mavic 3 Pro and Air 3 Pro were not only indistinguishable, but the Air 3 actually shot better shots on both the 1X and 3X. Again, because the Mavic 3 Pro is really just a Mavic 3 in terms of imaging pipeline technology, and that pipeline is now nearly two years old.

In any case, a quick lap around the photo block – and I’ll add a link here later this afternoon with some raw footage samples people can take a look at, from both cameras. I’ve got a separate Air 3 user guide I’ll be publishing later this week that dives into all the features in extreme detail (akin to my incredibly popular Mini 3 Pro user guide). Once the drone is up in the air you’ve got a menu on the right side with the different shooting modes. This is separated out into photo and video, plus various special modes like QuickShots, Mastershots, Hyperlapse, and Pano

Resolutions are controlled down in the lower right corner. Beware that by default you’ll be 1080p, so get yourself quickly to 4K. Likewise, for photos it’ll default to shooting in 12MP, rather than the 48MP option. The Air 3 will use a remosaic algorithm for the photo side, akin to what many mirrorless cameras use. For those that want to geek out, DJI engineers sent over this PowerPoint presentation on how the Air 3 sensor works:

Anyways, back to the subject at hand – shooting videos and photos. With the Air 3 you’ve got up to 200FPS for 1080p slowmo, and 120fps for 4K slowmo. You’ll find samples of both in my video. However, most noteworthy is that these are available across both lenses. Again, that’s a huge shift from past DJI products where the secondary lens always got sloppy seconds. The only thing you can’t do on the second lens is shot a panorama from it, which would be cool and perhaps down the road (you could of course still manually/painstakingly shoot it and stitch it later).

As with other DJI products you can manually change photo and video settings by tapping the icon in the lower right corner. The Air 3 lets you change white balance, aspect ratio, photo format (JPEG, RAW, or both), ISO, Shutter speed, and EV comp. You cannot change the aperture.

Likewise, for those that want to color grade themselves, you can use D-Log M, which is accessed through the camera menu in the upper right corner (the same place you’d change from 12MP to 48MP).

I’ll dive into all these settings more in the video tutorial, but nothing is a surprise here in terms of DJI features – it’s all been seen before on previous drones including the Mavic 3 series and even the Mini 3 Pro.

Unsurprisingly, I found myself gravitated back to the 70mm lens over and over again. I think for two reasons. First, the image quality is great – especially in daylight conditions (in low-light conditions you’ll start to see the differences to the main lens). But more importantly, it let me get better shots. The reality is that when you stick a camera hundreds of feet up in the air, the wide-angle look can become boring and repetitive. Most shots lack something to draw the eye towards. Whereas when you get a zoom lens involved, you can start to developer foreground/background interest (even if the blur here is minimal). You can get a safe distance away from people/things while still getting fascinating shots. For example, tracking boats out in a harbor, or cyclists on a road, doing so with a zoom lens is just way safer, and also more friendly for uninvolved people. It reduces drone noise for those nearby.

(Above: Screenshot from 4K/60 footage on 70mm lens)

However, one downside compared to the Mini 3 Pro is that the gimbal doesn’t turn sideways/vertical. Thus while it does have a 2.7K vertical shooting mode, it’s simply a crop from the horizontal image plane. DJI does give you the full sensor height though, so you do get a tiny bit more out of it, but it’s nothing compared to the full 4K shot on the rotated gimbal on the Mini 3 Pro.

I just wish for a day where we get this camera into the drone size of a Mini 3 Pro, with a rotating package. Perhaps someday.

(Note: I’m putting together a Dropbox/etc share with a pile of original footage/stills, should have that uploaded/labeled fully later today.)

Sports Tracking:

(Above: Screenshot from 4K/60 footage on 24mm lens in ActiveTrack)

The single biggest item with with the Air 3 is that it now supports omnidirectional obstacle avoidance. Previously the Air 2S lacked sideways obstacle avoidance, which meant that when it flew sideways tracking you, or, if trying to avoid an object it might go sideways, it could whack into something. And by ‘could’, I mean ‘most definitely will’. However, the Air 3 now has full coverage in every direction with new added sensors. These should keep it safe, at least in most conditions. I suspect winter low-light conditions with thin tree branches will still be challenging, as that can be even for Skydio.

Now, the second biggest new sports-related item, and arguably almost as important, is that the Air 3 supports using the tele lens in Active Track. This means that you no longer have to be as close to the person that you’re tracking. This is incredibly useful because it can get you away from problematic objects (trees), or even away from people. It’s super useful for side-profile shots, especially low ones, because you can be substantially farther away with the 70mm lens than the 24mm lens.

And the third most notable thing, is that you’ve now got ActiveTrack 5.0 related functions. So sure, there’s the better object recognition and recovery, but also the ability to insta-select which filming angle you want (e.g. left/front/angled/etc…). Previously it was just back/side, and to get different angles you had to manually shift the aircraft, but it wouldn’t n

Oh, and finally, you can film in 60FPS with ActiveTrack, which you couldn’t do previously on the Air 2S. Likewise, you can enable 10-bit via DLOG M, as well as any other feature you darn well want. Everything is supported in ActiveTrack modes.

So, when it comes to tracking, I’ve got a full video I’ll be uploading shortly above, but in the meantime, let’s run through the gist of it. First up, you’ll get the drone in the air and pointed towards you. Then, you can simply draw a box around yourself, or use the automatic recognition to select you or any other trackable object:

(Note: These are all lower-resolution screen recording shots. Further, the FlySafe data error message was a bug at the time for European users, that couldn’t be dismissed for more than 10 seconds.)

Once you’ve done that, it’ll pop-up the FocusTrack menu. This menu gives you three core features: ActiveTrack, Spotlight, and POI. The differences are as such:

ActiveTrack: This is the main mode where the drone will follow you, at a preset angle (e.g. behind/side/left-back/etc…), and you can adjust height/distance in real-time.

Spotlight: In this case, the drone’s camera will follow you, but the drone will stay put. Think of this like a stadium TV camera, following the action, but staying on a tripod. This is a great way to get varying shots for b-roll.

POI: In this mode, it’ll circle the subject (either going left or right), but, and here’s the big piece: It’ll still follow you! This is awesome if you’ve got a big wide-open area, and can just let it slowly (or not slowly) rotate around you.

Most of the time, you’ll use ActiveTrack, but I used POI today when I was out in the middle of a farm path/road, with nothing around that could cause problems, because it gave me interesting footage.

In any case, for now we’ll select ActiveTrack and get going. You *MUST* click the ‘Go’ button, and additionally, you *MUST* remember to hit record. Why on earth DJI can’t have it automatically start recording when it starts tracking (or at least have an option for such), is beyond. Skydio does that, and even DJI themselves do that for QuickShot modes. I struggle to see *ANY* scenario where I want to ActiveTrack but not record. Sigh.

Here’s the menu to choose which side you want to record from:

With that, off we go. Now, if you’re free and clear of objects to avoid, then the DJI Air 3 ActiveTrack is pretty darn solid. It never lost me once in this mode, even with light tree coverage. Easily tracked the entire time, and when I’d go behind trees, it’d also pick me back up again, as long as the gap was under a few seconds.

Here you can see we switched it to the side:

However, in areas of denser tree coverage, the Air 3 really struggled. Of course, one has to define the struggle. Firstly, the Air 3 did not crash into any trees, ever. That in an of itself is a first for me on a DJI drone. This thing made it three weeks without crashing itself. Were there close calls? Absolu-fudging-lutely. Did it crash? No. Not in the easier summer season (I suspect winter with thin tree branches would end differently).

Instead, the core issue was hesitancy. The DJI Air 3 is simply far too conservative/hesitant around trees, and when it got within a few meters of any trees (or the ground), it was slow to the speed of a walk. Thus making it impractical for anything but walking (again, if near substantial tree/obstacle coverage).

Now, that said, what can help substantially here is the 3x lens, because it can get you ‘out’ of the obstacle range – especially when shooting from the side where you may have a row of trees/etc and can get beyond that, such as this path here:

In that scenario, you’ll now be clear of the obstacle and can go pretty fast. Mind you, that you need to get the aircraft in ‘Normal’ mode and not ‘Sport’ mode, at least if there’s any chance of hitting anything (sport mode lets you go up to 75KPH). That’s because in sport mode there is NO OBSTACLE AVOIDNACE, thus, it’ll happily plow into that tree. However, if you’re out in the ocean/lake/whatever, then that’s not a problem. I used sport mode with ActiveTrack and the 3X lens to track a waterskiing boat, for example:

Worked great! I could have gotten in quite a bit closer, but given I didn’t know the people, I didn’t want to be super creepy. Only half-creepy.

A resulting snippet from the 4K video file. I do find that the Air 3, like the Mavic 3 Pro, tends to struggle a bit with exposure near the wake of boats on bright days.

Ultimately, the ActiveTrack on the Air 3 is a modest upgrade, mainly due to the added ActiveTrack 5.0 features (previously found on the Mavic 3) in conjunction with the tele lens. However, the object avoidance speed/system still falls far short of what Skydio offers, or has offered on even their oldest models. Further, the lack of a dedicated GPS beacon/locator, means that you need to fly with the full remote control, which adds more complexity. In my case, I used the previous remote control holder that I’ve reviewed, which worked with the DJI RC-N2 as well.

However frustratingly, the DJI RC 2 remote uses rear screw holes that are literally 1mm wider apart than the DJI RC 1, thus, my existing handlebar remote for that won’t work. I kid you not, 1mm wider apart. Why?!? Either way, having to carry a remote on a bike is still cumbersome. And while I have done MTB with it successfully, I always feel concerned my phone is going to fly out, go under my wheel, then somehow get sucked up into the drivetrain and splintered into a million pieces. Hasn’t happened yet, but I’ll undoubtedly be the one it happens to.

Either way – ActiveTrack is great in light coverage or moderately open environments, getting you easy to manage awesome shots. Just don’t expect it to work well in dense trees. And as always, please don’t use ActiveTrack in busy areas around others (like around cars on public roads).

Skydio Sports Tracking Comparison Thoughts:

Many will ask: Should I get the Air 3 or Skydio 2+? The Skydio drones are amazing sports tracking drones, albeit with a not-so-amazing camera. While Skydio’s obstacle avoidance and esports tracking capabilities make DJI’s look like child play, the invers is true on camera quality and features – Skydio doesn’t come close there. One could hope Skydio simply walks the 20 meters from their corporate headquarters front door, to GoPro’s corporate headquarters front door (seriously) – sharing the same parking lot. But alas, that hasn’t seemingly happened yet.

But the challenge is actually bigger: You can’t even buy a Skydio consumer drone anymore.

There’s continuing signs that Skydio is unfortunately existing the consumer market. Their consumer drones haven’t been available for a few months now, and when other media outlets have asked whether or not they’re continuing in the sports space, the answer has been “We will have a firm update to share in the coming months and can provide answers to your questions at that time,”. There’s nothing confidence inspiring about that. Instead, it’s likely that Skydio will continue to shift their focus towards consumer/military applications. Heck, even their website title now says they’re focused on the enterprise market.

While I get that from business standpoint, I think it might be short-sighted. As DJI continues to see more and more US political pressure each month, with continued taunts of expanding the already-existing governmental purchase ban of some sort, Skydio could be left in the position to easily capture the US consumer market if political winds shift.  The US market is merely one political chess move away from Skydio being in the position to own the entire US market overnight. I’d hope their investors see that opportunity, and realize that the ‘cost’ of maintaining a consumer division is relatively small compared to the opportunity that continues to increase in political temperature. While I don’t think a single-manufacturer scenario is good for consumers in any scenario (here or otherwise), one can’t ignore that reality.

In any case, given Skydio’s lack of comment, there’s little choice left but to recommend the Air 3 for sports tracking as the best overall option.

Summary:

The DJI Air 3 is a modest upgrade in some categories, a major upgrade in others, and a slight downgrade in a few. It really depends on which perspective you’re coming from, or rather, which drone you’re coming from. For an older unit like the DJI Air 2 or Air 2S, the obstacle avoidance and battery life is a big step up. Likewise, having a secondary lens is incredibly useful – both from a photograph/videography standpoint, as well as safety/regulatory standpoint.

While some will dismiss the unit due to lack of a 1” sensor from the Air 2S, both my imagery as well as numerous other reviewers imagery show that argument simply doesn’t hold real-world water. The imagery coming off the unit is incredibly good, and on-par with the DJI Mavic 3 Pro in almost all my shots (and even better in a handful) – even if at lower than 5K resolutions. Again, as I outlined above – imaging pipeline technology moves on. And what might have been great 2-3 years ago, is run of the mill today.

Rather, my criticisms on this unit are as usual the lack of meaningful/major progress forward on the ActiveTrack front. Sure, it has ActiveTrack 5.0 – but that’s what the Mavic 3 had when they added it 1.5 years ago. And it wasn’t all that different from other drones before it. Likewise, it’s a bit quirky to me that the Mini 3 Pro has a gimbal that can rotate vertically, but the Air 3 doesn’t. While one could make that same argument for the Mavic 3 series, that unit came out 1.5 years prior to the Mini 3 Pro. Whether you like vertical (portrait) imagery or not is somewhat irrelevant in 2023, if you’re shooting for clients, they’re gonna demand those shots – and this unit puts you at a disadvantage to the Mini 3 Pro in that realm.

Still, despite my minor annoyances, this is a good middle-ground option in the DJI lineup. It certainly lacks the ‘holy crap’ wow-factor that DJI delivered with the Mini 3 Pro, but it also lacks the ‘holy crap’ price tag of the Mavic 3 Pro. Thus, if you’re looking for a bit of an edge with more features than the Mini 3 Pro, notably waypoint support or full obstacle avoidance, this delivers on that front.

With that – thanks for reading!

Product Reviews – DC Rainmaker